<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 719 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284030</link>
    <description>Public service promotion must comply strictly with recruitment rules, including substantive appointment and prescribed qualifying service, and an ad hoc appointment made outside the rules cannot be regularised so as to create eligibility. The text further explains that relaxation power cannot be used to bypass essential eligibility conditions or to secure a particular individual&#039;s advancement, especially where the Commission&#039;s consultation is required. It also states that altering a post and invoking reservation to facilitate promotion, when driven by private interest rather than public interest, amounts to malice in law and offends equality requirements in public employment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 719 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284030</link>
      <description>Public service promotion must comply strictly with recruitment rules, including substantive appointment and prescribed qualifying service, and an ad hoc appointment made outside the rules cannot be regularised so as to create eligibility. The text further explains that relaxation power cannot be used to bypass essential eligibility conditions or to secure a particular individual&#039;s advancement, especially where the Commission&#039;s consultation is required. It also states that altering a post and invoking reservation to facilitate promotion, when driven by private interest rather than public interest, amounts to malice in law and offends equality requirements in public employment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>