<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 999 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387515</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the assessment under Section 153C due to lack of jurisdiction, being time-barred, and violating natural justice principles. The assessment was based on non-incriminating evidence, lacked incriminating documents, and denied cross-examination opportunities. The Tribunal stressed the need for incriminating material for Section 153C proceedings and the right to cross-examine witnesses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2019 09:46:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 999 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387515</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the assessment under Section 153C due to lack of jurisdiction, being time-barred, and violating natural justice principles. The assessment was based on non-incriminating evidence, lacked incriminating documents, and denied cross-examination opportunities. The Tribunal stressed the need for incriminating material for Section 153C proceedings and the right to cross-examine witnesses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>