<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 989 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387505</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to reduce the addition on unverifiable purchases and delete the undisclosed interest income addition. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deleted as it was based on estimated income, not conclusive proof of concealment. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2019 09:33:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 989 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387505</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to reduce the addition on unverifiable purchases and delete the undisclosed interest income addition. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deleted as it was based on estimated income, not conclusive proof of concealment. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>