<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 979 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387495</link>
    <description>Guideline value is only a relevant indicator of fair market value and is not conclusive for capital gains computation. Where the assessee relies on a registered valuer&#039;s report and the valuation is disputed, the proper course is reference to the DVO; the valuation adopted by the lower authorities was therefore not sustained as the final basis, and the matter was remitted for recomputation. Separately, capital gains could not be denied merely because the property was mortgaged to secure borrowings of group concerns, since the sale proceeds remained attributable to the assessee&#039;s property and the charging provision applied to the full consideration realised, subject to admissible deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 09:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 979 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387495</link>
      <description>Guideline value is only a relevant indicator of fair market value and is not conclusive for capital gains computation. Where the assessee relies on a registered valuer&#039;s report and the valuation is disputed, the proper course is reference to the DVO; the valuation adopted by the lower authorities was therefore not sustained as the final basis, and the matter was remitted for recomputation. Separately, capital gains could not be denied merely because the property was mortgaged to secure borrowings of group concerns, since the sale proceeds remained attributable to the assessee&#039;s property and the charging provision applied to the full consideration realised, subject to admissible deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>