<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 966 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH, HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387482</link>
    <description>The Tribunal admitted the petition and initiated the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor, appointing an Interim Resolution Professional and declaring a moratorium to protect the interests of all parties involved. The Tribunal found that the alleged dispute by the Corporate Debtor was unsupported by evidence and that the debt was not time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2019 08:10:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 966 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH, HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387482</link>
      <description>The Tribunal admitted the petition and initiated the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor, appointing an Interim Resolution Professional and declaring a moratorium to protect the interests of all parties involved. The Tribunal found that the alleged dispute by the Corporate Debtor was unsupported by evidence and that the debt was not time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>