<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty Confirmed Against Partnership Firm for Fraudulent CENVAT Credit Availment Despite Rule 26(2) Argument on Natural Persons.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49869</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty - fraudulent availment of CENVAT Credit - It was contended that, Penalty under Rule 26(2) provision can be imposed only on a natural person. - The appellant is a partnership firm and per se is not a natural person, arguments rejected - Penalty confirmed</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2019 07:54:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2019 07:54:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty Confirmed Against Partnership Firm for Fraudulent CENVAT Credit Availment Despite Rule 26(2) Argument on Natural Persons.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49869</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty - fraudulent availment of CENVAT Credit - It was contended that, Penalty under Rule 26(2) provision can be imposed only on a natural person. - The appellant is a partnership firm and per se is not a natural person, arguments rejected - Penalty confirmed</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2019 07:54:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>