https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284029 The commentary explains that the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 operates as a self-contained code for investigation, arrest, attachment, confiscation and prosecution, with the Code of Criminal Procedure applying only where not inconsistent. It states that offences under the Act remain cognizable after the amendment, and that prior sanction under the Code is not required for investigation or arrest. It further notes that pending appellate proceedings on attachment do not bar prosecution for money laundering, and that writ interference is unwarranted where the complaint and investigation disclose a prima facie case involving proceeds of crime, layering and integration. en-us Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Oct 2019 07:40:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284029 The commentary explains that the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 operates as a self-contained code for investigation, arrest, attachment, confiscation and prosecution, with the Code of Criminal Procedure applying only where not inconsistent. It states that offences under the Act remain cognizable after the amendment, and that prior sanction under the Code is not required for investigation or arrest. It further notes that pending appellate proceedings on attachment do not bar prosecution for money laundering, and that writ interference is unwarranted where the complaint and investigation disclose a prima facie case involving proceeds of crime, layering and integration. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284029