https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284022 In land acquisition proceedings, the civil court can determine compensation only when a valid statutory reference on that issue has been made; a reference confined to apportionment does not confer jurisdiction to decide quantum, and the absence of such reference is an inherent defect that cannot be waived. On valuation, the court found the rejected sale instances too remote, insufficiently comparable, or otherwise unreliable, while the accepted sales and the agricultural nature of the lands with road proximity supported the rate adopted. The compensation figure was therefore upheld and left undisturbed. en-us Thu, 23 Jan 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Oct 2019 18:27:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284022 In land acquisition proceedings, the civil court can determine compensation only when a valid statutory reference on that issue has been made; a reference confined to apportionment does not confer jurisdiction to decide quantum, and the absence of such reference is an inherent defect that cannot be waived. On valuation, the court found the rejected sale instances too remote, insufficiently comparable, or otherwise unreliable, while the accepted sales and the agricultural nature of the lands with road proximity supported the rate adopted. The compensation figure was therefore upheld and left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Jan 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284022