<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (11) TMI 117 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284019</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellant had not proven his title to the Gaddi based on either the general law or the specific custom he alleged. The court emphasized that the appellant&#039;s suit for ejectment must succeed or fail based on the title he established, and he could not succeed merely because the defendant in possession had no title. The appeal was dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:29:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (11) TMI 117 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284019</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellant had not proven his title to the Gaddi based on either the general law or the specific custom he alleged. The court emphasized that the appellant&#039;s suit for ejectment must succeed or fail based on the title he established, and he could not succeed merely because the defendant in possession had no title. The appeal was dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>