<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (3) TMI 132 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284018</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the lower courts&#039; decisions in a case concerning the validity of adoption and ancestral land. The District Judge found the plaintiff validly adopted as an heir by Kartar Singh, based on the Punjab Custom (Power to Contest) Act, 1920. The courts emphasized the necessity of specific pleading and evidence on ancestral property and customs, dismissing the appeal due to lack of clarity and proof from the defendants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (3) TMI 132 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284018</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the lower courts&#039; decisions in a case concerning the validity of adoption and ancestral land. The District Judge found the plaintiff validly adopted as an heir by Kartar Singh, based on the Punjab Custom (Power to Contest) Act, 1920. The courts emphasized the necessity of specific pleading and evidence on ancestral property and customs, dismissing the appeal due to lack of clarity and proof from the defendants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>