<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1929 (10) TMI 4 - Privy Council</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284017</link>
    <description>The Privy Council dismissed the appeal regarding ownership of lands claimed by the appellant, originally given by Hote Khan. The lands were transferred to Hote Khan&#039;s widow, who likely passed them to her spiritual adviser as trustee. The appellant&#039;s claim of ownership by gift was not substantiated in the defense and was consequently rejected. No costs were awarded due to the absence of the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 1929 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:10:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1929 (10) TMI 4 - Privy Council</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284017</link>
      <description>The Privy Council dismissed the appeal regarding ownership of lands claimed by the appellant, originally given by Hote Khan. The lands were transferred to Hote Khan&#039;s widow, who likely passed them to her spiritual adviser as trustee. The appellant&#039;s claim of ownership by gift was not substantiated in the defense and was consequently rejected. No costs were awarded due to the absence of the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 1929 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>