<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1929 (10) TMI 4 - Privy Council</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284017</link>
    <description>Title to land could not be established on the alleged gift because the evidence was rejected by both lower courts and those concurrent findings of fact were not displaced. The alternative claim of a gift by the widow also failed because it had not been pleaded in the defence, and evidence cannot be admitted to support a case never put forward. The appellant therefore failed to prove title on either basis, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 1929 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:10:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1929 (10) TMI 4 - Privy Council</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284017</link>
      <description>Title to land could not be established on the alleged gift because the evidence was rejected by both lower courts and those concurrent findings of fact were not displaced. The alternative claim of a gift by the widow also failed because it had not been pleaded in the defence, and evidence cannot be admitted to support a case never put forward. The appellant therefore failed to prove title on either basis, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 1929 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>