https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284016 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the decree passed by the appellate court and restoring the trial court's decree in favor of the appellant. The contract was deemed void and unenforceable under Section 175(3) of the Government of India Act, 1935. The appellant was entitled to compensation under Section 70 of the Indian Contract Act. The plea of estoppel by negligence raised by the respondent was rejected. en-us Fri, 05 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:04:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284016 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the decree passed by the appellate court and restoring the trial court's decree in favor of the appellant. The contract was deemed void and unenforceable under Section 175(3) of the Government of India Act, 1935. The appellant was entitled to compensation under Section 70 of the Indian Contract Act. The plea of estoppel by negligence raised by the respondent was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284016