<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1915 (7) TMI 2 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284015</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court reversed the High Court&#039;s decision, reinstating the Trial Judge&#039;s decree. It found the property transaction to be a benami one, emphasizing the importance of the source of purchase money. Additionally, the court upheld the principle of estoppel in the landlord-tenant dispute, ruling in favor of the plaintiff based on the tenant&#039;s inability to deny the landlord&#039;s title while in possession.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 1915 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 16:52:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1915 (7) TMI 2 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284015</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court reversed the High Court&#039;s decision, reinstating the Trial Judge&#039;s decree. It found the property transaction to be a benami one, emphasizing the importance of the source of purchase money. Additionally, the court upheld the principle of estoppel in the landlord-tenant dispute, ruling in favor of the plaintiff based on the tenant&#039;s inability to deny the landlord&#039;s title while in possession.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 1915 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>