<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1915 (7) TMI 2 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284015</link>
    <description>Purchase of property in the name of a nominal transferee was treated as benami where the purchase money came from the taluqdar, the property was financed on mortgage of his own assets, and the surrounding circumstances showed no intention to benefit the mistress. The bungalow was therefore held to belong beneficially to the taluqdar&#039;s estate. A tenant inducted into possession cannot deny the landlord&#039;s title while still in possession; rent payment and continued occupation after notice to quit attracted statutory estoppel under Section 116 of the Indian Evidence Act. The High Court&#039;s decree was set aside and the trial decree restored with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 1915 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 16:52:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1915 (7) TMI 2 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284015</link>
      <description>Purchase of property in the name of a nominal transferee was treated as benami where the purchase money came from the taluqdar, the property was financed on mortgage of his own assets, and the surrounding circumstances showed no intention to benefit the mistress. The bungalow was therefore held to belong beneficially to the taluqdar&#039;s estate. A tenant inducted into possession cannot deny the landlord&#039;s title while still in possession; rent payment and continued occupation after notice to quit attracted statutory estoppel under Section 116 of the Indian Evidence Act. The High Court&#039;s decree was set aside and the trial decree restored with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 1915 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>