https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284014 The Supreme Court found the respondent guilty of the corrupt practice of exceeding the prescribed expenditure limit under Section 123(6) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. The appeal was allowed, the High Court's order was set aside, and the respondent's election was annulled. The respondent was ordered to pay the appellant's costs in both the Supreme Court and the High Court. Appeal allowed. en-us Thu, 02 Dec 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Oct 2019 16:48:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284014 The Supreme Court found the respondent guilty of the corrupt practice of exceeding the prescribed expenditure limit under Section 123(6) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. The appeal was allowed, the High Court's order was set aside, and the respondent's election was annulled. The respondent was ordered to pay the appellant's costs in both the Supreme Court and the High Court. Appeal allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Dec 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284014