<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (8) TMI 68 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284012</link>
    <description>Commission paid to managers under an agreement was to be tested for deductibility by statutory reasonableness and commercial expediency, viewed from the standpoint of a prudent businessman, not by a purely subjective revenue assessment. The relevant factors were the employees&#039; remuneration, conditions of service, business profits, and prevailing practice in similar businesses; linking managerial pay to net profits could be a proper incentive and was not unreasonable merely because duties remained managerial or the amount was computed by reference to profits. Applying that standard, the commission was held to be a reasonable business expenditure and allowable as a deduction, and the reference was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 15:43:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (8) TMI 68 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284012</link>
      <description>Commission paid to managers under an agreement was to be tested for deductibility by statutory reasonableness and commercial expediency, viewed from the standpoint of a prudent businessman, not by a purely subjective revenue assessment. The relevant factors were the employees&#039; remuneration, conditions of service, business profits, and prevailing practice in similar businesses; linking managerial pay to net profits could be a proper incentive and was not unreasonable merely because duties remained managerial or the amount was computed by reference to profits. Applying that standard, the commission was held to be a reasonable business expenditure and allowable as a deduction, and the reference was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>