<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 941 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387457</link>
    <description>The Allahabad High Court allowed a writ petition challenging a tax assessment order under Section 64 of the U.P. GST Act, 2018 for March 2018, which had dismissed the petitioner&#039;s first appeal as untimely. The court relied on a prior case with similar facts and reasoning, emphasizing the importance of adhering to procedural timelines, consistency in judicial decisions, and strict compliance with statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 15:25:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 941 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387457</link>
      <description>The Allahabad High Court allowed a writ petition challenging a tax assessment order under Section 64 of the U.P. GST Act, 2018 for March 2018, which had dismissed the petitioner&#039;s first appeal as untimely. The court relied on a prior case with similar facts and reasoning, emphasizing the importance of adhering to procedural timelines, consistency in judicial decisions, and strict compliance with statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>