https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387455 The court allowed the petitioner to amend the petition, directing immediate implementation. Despite the petitioner's deposit of tax and penalty, the second respondent proceeded with confiscation under the CGST Act. The court ordered the immediate release of goods and conveyance pending the final petition outcome. The petitioner was required to file an undertaking to pay any balance amount if unsuccessful, while retaining the right to challenge the confiscation order. The case was adjourned to 20.11.2019 for further proceedings. en-us Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Oct 2019 15:25:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387455 The court allowed the petitioner to amend the petition, directing immediate implementation. Despite the petitioner's deposit of tax and penalty, the second respondent proceeded with confiscation under the CGST Act. The court ordered the immediate release of goods and conveyance pending the final petition outcome. The petitioner was required to file an undertaking to pay any balance amount if unsuccessful, while retaining the right to challenge the confiscation order. The case was adjourned to 20.11.2019 for further proceedings. Case-Laws GST Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387455