<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 929 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387445</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the summons under the Income Tax Act, 1961, finding the Assistant Director of Income Tax (Inv.) competent to issue the summons based on the search conducted. The court did not examine the objection to territorial jurisdiction or the transfer of PAN jurisdiction, as they were not directly relevant. The petitioner&#039;s right to challenge the search and seizure on other grounds was acknowledged but not addressed in this petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 14:59:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 929 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387445</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the summons under the Income Tax Act, 1961, finding the Assistant Director of Income Tax (Inv.) competent to issue the summons based on the search conducted. The court did not examine the objection to territorial jurisdiction or the transfer of PAN jurisdiction, as they were not directly relevant. The petitioner&#039;s right to challenge the search and seizure on other grounds was acknowledged but not addressed in this petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>