https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284009 Limitation under civil procedure does not govern the Government's statutory ination of pay and allowances on reinstatement, and a time-barred claim merely bars the remedy in court without extinguishing the underlying right to salary. Rule 54 of the U.P. Fundamental Rules did not authorise refusal of arrears on an extraneous limitation ground; it only enabled consideration of pay and allowances payable on reinstatement. The servant's unlawful deprivation of service and later reinstatement preserved an enforceable entitlement to salary for the entire period of absence, including increments, dearness allowance and interest. The refusal to pay arrears was invalid and without jurisdiction. en-us Mon, 15 May 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Oct 2019 14:56:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284009 Limitation under civil procedure does not govern the Government's statutory ination of pay and allowances on reinstatement, and a time-barred claim merely bars the remedy in court without extinguishing the underlying right to salary. Rule 54 of the U.P. Fundamental Rules did not authorise refusal of arrears on an extraneous limitation ground; it only enabled consideration of pay and allowances payable on reinstatement. The servant's unlawful deprivation of service and later reinstatement preserved an enforceable entitlement to salary for the entire period of absence, including increments, dearness allowance and interest. The refusal to pay arrears was invalid and without jurisdiction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 15 May 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284009