https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284003 The Supreme Court held that the enhanced rate of solatium and interest introduced by the Amendment Act of 1984 could not be applied to cases finalized before the specified period. The Court determined that the High Court's judgment enhancing compensation was without jurisdiction and deemed null. It was established that an executing court cannot go behind a decree unless it lacks inherent jurisdiction, making the High Court's order void ab initio. Consequently, the Executing Court rightfully dismissed the execution applications based on the null judgment. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the decisions of the Executing Court and High Court. en-us Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Oct 2019 12:11:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284003 The Supreme Court held that the enhanced rate of solatium and interest introduced by the Amendment Act of 1984 could not be applied to cases finalized before the specified period. The Court determined that the High Court's judgment enhancing compensation was without jurisdiction and deemed null. It was established that an executing court cannot go behind a decree unless it lacks inherent jurisdiction, making the High Court's order void ab initio. Consequently, the Executing Court rightfully dismissed the execution applications based on the null judgment. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the decisions of the Executing Court and High Court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284003