<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 445 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284002</link>
    <description>Amended Section 4-A(3) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 vested the Commissioner with power to cancel or modify an eligibility certificate. Because proceedings on that question were already pending before the Commissioner, the Divisional Level Committee lacked basis to proceed independently on the same issue. The Allahabad HC therefore quashed the Committee&#039;s order and allowed the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 445 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284002</link>
      <description>Amended Section 4-A(3) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 vested the Commissioner with power to cancel or modify an eligibility certificate. Because proceedings on that question were already pending before the Commissioner, the Divisional Level Committee lacked basis to proceed independently on the same issue. The Allahabad HC therefore quashed the Committee&#039;s order and allowed the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>