https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20181 Refusal to stay recovery of an assessed tax demand will not attract writ interference unless the order is shown to be arbitrary, passed without application of mind, or influenced by extraneous considerations. The petitioner's reliance on an earlier Tribunal view and financial hardship did not, by itself, establish a prima facie case for intervention. On the materials before it, the Court found no basis to disturb the discretionary stay-refusal order, and the challenge was rejected, leaving recovery undisturbed. en-us Wed, 16 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:49:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20181 Refusal to stay recovery of an assessed tax demand will not attract writ interference unless the order is shown to be arbitrary, passed without application of mind, or influenced by extraneous considerations. The petitioner's reliance on an earlier Tribunal view and financial hardship did not, by itself, establish a prima facie case for intervention. On the materials before it, the Court found no basis to disturb the discretionary stay-refusal order, and the challenge was rejected, leaving recovery undisturbed. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 16 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20181