<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (1) TMI 453 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284001</link>
    <description>The power to cancel an eligibility certificate under section 4-A(3) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act vested in the Commissioner of Sales Tax, and earlier in the State Government, not in the Divisional Level Committee. A retrospective amendment widening section 4-A(3) did not validate a cancellation order passed by an authority lacking jurisdiction. The cancellation order was therefore without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 11:56:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (1) TMI 453 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284001</link>
      <description>The power to cancel an eligibility certificate under section 4-A(3) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act vested in the Commissioner of Sales Tax, and earlier in the State Government, not in the Divisional Level Committee. A retrospective amendment widening section 4-A(3) did not validate a cancellation order passed by an authority lacking jurisdiction. The cancellation order was therefore without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>