<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 687 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283998</link>
    <description>The court held that the Officer on Special Duty lacked statutory authority to issue a directive preventing the Director from granting quarry leases. The Memorandum was deemed invalid, and the court emphasized the Director&#039;s sole competence in granting leases. Additionally, the court stressed the importance of public authorities acting promptly, setting aside the previous order and directing the disposal of pending applications within eight weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 11:13:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 687 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283998</link>
      <description>The court held that the Officer on Special Duty lacked statutory authority to issue a directive preventing the Director from granting quarry leases. The Memorandum was deemed invalid, and the court emphasized the Director&#039;s sole competence in granting leases. Additionally, the court stressed the importance of public authorities acting promptly, setting aside the previous order and directing the disposal of pending applications within eight weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>