<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 740 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283997</link>
    <description>An educational trust does not become a minority institution merely because its founder belonged to a minority community; the decisive test is whether the trust was established for the benefit of that minority. Where the trust deed shows a secular charitable purpose, open donations, and benefits for students irrespective of caste, creed or religion, the trust remains a secular public charitable trust and may be amenable to suit under Section 92 CPC. In such a trust, a court may frame a scheme for administration when proper management requires it, and an executive trustee may be upheld if appointed under a secular scheme. Unsubstantiated allegations of mismanagement do not, by themselves, justify a receiver or further interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 740 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283997</link>
      <description>An educational trust does not become a minority institution merely because its founder belonged to a minority community; the decisive test is whether the trust was established for the benefit of that minority. Where the trust deed shows a secular charitable purpose, open donations, and benefits for students irrespective of caste, creed or religion, the trust remains a secular public charitable trust and may be amenable to suit under Section 92 CPC. In such a trust, a court may frame a scheme for administration when proper management requires it, and an executive trustee may be upheld if appointed under a secular scheme. Unsubstantiated allegations of mismanagement do not, by themselves, justify a receiver or further interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>