<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 1002 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283996</link>
    <description>Rule 10-A of the A.P. Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1979 was treated as a valid exercise of delegated power because regulation of seating capacity had a direct link to the statutory scheme for licensing and cinematograph regulation, including reduction of capacity in appropriate cases. The Government memo dated 23-5-1995 was considered outside statutory power because executive instructions cannot override the Rules or curtail the discretion vested in the Licensing Authority. A statutory authority must apply its own judgment under Rule 10-A, so rejection of applications solely on the basis of the memo amounted to abdication of statutory function and vitiated the orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:41:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 1002 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283996</link>
      <description>Rule 10-A of the A.P. Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1979 was treated as a valid exercise of delegated power because regulation of seating capacity had a direct link to the statutory scheme for licensing and cinematograph regulation, including reduction of capacity in appropriate cases. The Government memo dated 23-5-1995 was considered outside statutory power because executive instructions cannot override the Rules or curtail the discretion vested in the Licensing Authority. A statutory authority must apply its own judgment under Rule 10-A, so rejection of applications solely on the basis of the memo amounted to abdication of statutory function and vitiated the orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>