https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283996 The Court upheld the validity of Rule 10-A of the A.P. Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1979, finding it not ultra-vires the A.P. Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955. The Memorandum issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh was deemed ultra-vires and without jurisdiction, as it contradicted the rules and imposed unreasonable restrictions. The Licensing Authority's rejection of applications based on the impugned memo was declared illegal, and the orders were set aside. The Court granted relief by setting aside the impugned memo, allowing petitioners to apply for reduction of seating capacity without a cut-off date, and directing formalization of interim orders by the Licensing Authority. en-us Thu, 26 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:41:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283996 The Court upheld the validity of Rule 10-A of the A.P. Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1979, finding it not ultra-vires the A.P. Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955. The Memorandum issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh was deemed ultra-vires and without jurisdiction, as it contradicted the rules and imposed unreasonable restrictions. The Licensing Authority's rejection of applications based on the impugned memo was declared illegal, and the orders were set aside. The Court granted relief by setting aside the impugned memo, allowing petitioners to apply for reduction of seating capacity without a cut-off date, and directing formalization of interim orders by the Licensing Authority. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 26 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283996