<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 910 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387426</link>
    <description>The ITAT concluded that payments for transponder charges made by the assessee did not constitute royalty under the Indo-US DTAA, and therefore, the assessee was not required to deduct TDS. The appeal by the revenue against the CIT(A) order was dismissed based on precedents from the Hon&#039;ble Delhi High Court and ITAT, Mumbai. The judgment was pronounced on 14/10/2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 08:51:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 910 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387426</link>
      <description>The ITAT concluded that payments for transponder charges made by the assessee did not constitute royalty under the Indo-US DTAA, and therefore, the assessee was not required to deduct TDS. The appeal by the revenue against the CIT(A) order was dismissed based on precedents from the Hon&#039;ble Delhi High Court and ITAT, Mumbai. The judgment was pronounced on 14/10/2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>