<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 897 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387413</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order as the confiscation of Nepali currency and the vehicle, as well as the penalties imposed under the Customs Act, lacked a legal basis due to the absence of evidence of smuggled goods or their sale. The appellant&#039;s possession of Nepali currency in India was not deemed a violation, leading to the allowance of all appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 08:22:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 897 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387413</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order as the confiscation of Nepali currency and the vehicle, as well as the penalties imposed under the Customs Act, lacked a legal basis due to the absence of evidence of smuggled goods or their sale. The appellant&#039;s possession of Nepali currency in India was not deemed a violation, leading to the allowance of all appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>