<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 891 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387407</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand under &#039;Business Auxiliary Service&#039; for both periods and held the demand for the second period as barred by limitation. The decision was based on settled legal principles and precedents, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 08:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 891 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387407</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand under &#039;Business Auxiliary Service&#039; for both periods and held the demand for the second period as barred by limitation. The decision was based on settled legal principles and precedents, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>