<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 885 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387401</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the value of drawings provided by customers should have been included in the assessable value of the manufactured goods. The penalty imposed on the appellant for failing to include this value was upheld due to the lack of evidence provided and the statutory requirement to consider such expertise in the transaction value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 08:06:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 885 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387401</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the value of drawings provided by customers should have been included in the assessable value of the manufactured goods. The penalty imposed on the appellant for failing to include this value was upheld due to the lack of evidence provided and the statutory requirement to consider such expertise in the transaction value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>