<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (7) TMI 30 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20175</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the Income-tax Officer was not justified in rectifying the rectification order as the issue of deductions under sections 80L and 86(v) was debatable, not a clear mistake on the record. The Court emphasized the distinction between obvious errors and debatable legal points when considering rectification orders under the Income-tax Act, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:34:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (7) TMI 30 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20175</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the Income-tax Officer was not justified in rectifying the rectification order as the issue of deductions under sections 80L and 86(v) was debatable, not a clear mistake on the record. The Court emphasized the distinction between obvious errors and debatable legal points when considering rectification orders under the Income-tax Act, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>