https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283988 The court held in favor of the petitioners, ruling that they were not liable for the differential amount and license fee for the periods of unlawful closure of their manufacturing and bottling plants. The court directed the respondents to refund the excess amounts within three months. Additionally, the court declared the repeated sealing and closure of the licensed premises without suspending or canceling licenses as wholly without authority in law. The court also instructed the authorities to consider the petitioners' claims for compensation for destroyed stock within six months, emphasizing that the State must bear the consequences of its officials' wrongful actions. en-us Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Oct 2019 07:54:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283988 The court held in favor of the petitioners, ruling that they were not liable for the differential amount and license fee for the periods of unlawful closure of their manufacturing and bottling plants. The court directed the respondents to refund the excess amounts within three months. Additionally, the court declared the repeated sealing and closure of the licensed premises without suspending or canceling licenses as wholly without authority in law. The court also instructed the authorities to consider the petitioners' claims for compensation for destroyed stock within six months, emphasizing that the State must bear the consequences of its officials' wrongful actions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283988