<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 878 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387394</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) order, deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer under section 68. The Tribunal found that since the assessment for the relevant year was not pending at the time of the search, the addition made by the AO in the unabated assessment under section 153A was not sustainable as it lacked any incriminating material found during the search. As a result, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2019 15:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 878 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387394</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) order, deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer under section 68. The Tribunal found that since the assessment for the relevant year was not pending at the time of the search, the addition made by the AO in the unabated assessment under section 153A was not sustainable as it lacked any incriminating material found during the search. As a result, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>