https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283975 A statutory notification imposing provident fund contribution could not be enforced retrospectively against existing workmen where such deduction would create hardship, so protection from backdated recovery was sustained. For theatre owners who had obtained a stay in writ proceedings, the Court declined identical equitable relief and held that their contribution liability would run from the dates on which they filed their writ petitions. The Court thus preserved employee protection against retrospective burden while moulding relief against the litigating owners under its constitutional powers. en-us Tue, 12 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Oct 2019 17:53:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283975 A statutory notification imposing provident fund contribution could not be enforced retrospectively against existing workmen where such deduction would create hardship, so protection from backdated recovery was sustained. For theatre owners who had obtained a stay in writ proceedings, the Court declined identical equitable relief and held that their contribution liability would run from the dates on which they filed their writ petitions. The Court thus preserved employee protection against retrospective burden while moulding relief against the litigating owners under its constitutional powers. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283975