<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 1171 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283974</link>
    <description>Prospective operation of a judicial declaration can preserve settled discretionary allotments where retrospective application would reopen completed transactions, create uncertainty and produce unequal treatment among similarly placed allottees. The High Court ruling on allotments under the Haryana Urban Development Authority Act was treated as operative from 23 April 1996. Allotments made before that date remained protected from retrospective disturbance, except where they failed to conform to the earlier legal position and were cancelled through due procedure. The approach applies prospective overruling to balance legal correction with certainty, settled expectations and public interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 17:41:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 1171 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283974</link>
      <description>Prospective operation of a judicial declaration can preserve settled discretionary allotments where retrospective application would reopen completed transactions, create uncertainty and produce unequal treatment among similarly placed allottees. The High Court ruling on allotments under the Haryana Urban Development Authority Act was treated as operative from 23 April 1996. Allotments made before that date remained protected from retrospective disturbance, except where they failed to conform to the earlier legal position and were cancelled through due procedure. The approach applies prospective overruling to balance legal correction with certainty, settled expectations and public interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>