<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (11) TMI 50 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20168</link>
    <description>The court held that the appellate authority has the implied power to grant a stay of tax collection during the pendency of appeals. It directed the respondent to consider and decide on the stay applications filed by the petitioner. The issues concerning the inclusion of sales tax collections as income and the disallowance of depreciation were to be addressed in the ongoing appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:17:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (11) TMI 50 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20168</link>
      <description>The court held that the appellate authority has the implied power to grant a stay of tax collection during the pendency of appeals. It directed the respondent to consider and decide on the stay applications filed by the petitioner. The issues concerning the inclusion of sales tax collections as income and the disallowance of depreciation were to be addressed in the ongoing appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>