<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 852 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387368</link>
    <description>The Customs Act, 1962 does not provide a complete code for commencing investigation into customs offences, so Section 4(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code applies where the special law is silent. If the alleged offence is non-cognizable, Section 155(2) requires prior Magistrate authorisation before investigation can lawfully begin. A letter of rogatory under Section 166-A cannot stand on its own and must rest on a validly commenced investigation. On this reasoning, investigation started without the mandatory non-cognizable procedure was treated as unsustainable, and the consequential rogatory process was vulnerable to quashing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2020 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 852 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387368</link>
      <description>The Customs Act, 1962 does not provide a complete code for commencing investigation into customs offences, so Section 4(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code applies where the special law is silent. If the alleged offence is non-cognizable, Section 155(2) requires prior Magistrate authorisation before investigation can lawfully begin. A letter of rogatory under Section 166-A cannot stand on its own and must rest on a validly commenced investigation. On this reasoning, investigation started without the mandatory non-cognizable procedure was treated as unsustainable, and the consequential rogatory process was vulnerable to quashing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>