https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283966 A pre-existing arbitration clause referring to statutory modification or re-enactment was read as embracing the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, so pending proceedings could be governed by the new Act under section 85 where that matched the parties' intention. The court rejected the view that a fresh post-commencement agreement was required. It also treated receipt of a signed copy of the award as the operative event for limitation under sections 31(5), 33 and 34, and allowed exclusion of time spent bona fide pursuing the matter in Civil Court. The respondent was therefore left free to pursue post-award remedies under the 1996 Act. en-us Thu, 12 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Oct 2019 14:58:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283966 A pre-existing arbitration clause referring to statutory modification or re-enactment was read as embracing the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, so pending proceedings could be governed by the new Act under section 85 where that matched the parties' intention. The court rejected the view that a fresh post-commencement agreement was required. It also treated receipt of a signed copy of the award as the operative event for limitation under sections 31(5), 33 and 34, and allowed exclusion of time spent bona fide pursuing the matter in Civil Court. The respondent was therefore left free to pursue post-award remedies under the 1996 Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283966