<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 566 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283963</link>
    <description>The document addresses post-decree interest on a modified arbitral award and notes that, on the facts of the commercial transaction and the parties&#039; correspondence, the Supreme Court interfered only on the interest component. It found a lower rate appropriate for the period after decree and reduced post-decree interest from 11% per annum to 7.5% per annum, while otherwise maintaining the modified award.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 13:25:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 566 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283963</link>
      <description>The document addresses post-decree interest on a modified arbitral award and notes that, on the facts of the commercial transaction and the parties&#039; correspondence, the Supreme Court interfered only on the interest component. It found a lower rate appropriate for the period after decree and reduced post-decree interest from 11% per annum to 7.5% per annum, while otherwise maintaining the modified award.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>