https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283962 Notice of filing of the arbitral award in court is required to trigger the 30-day limitation period under Article 119(b); mere knowledge of the award or a registry office report is insufficient, so the objections were not time-barred. Interference with an arbitral award remains limited where the arbitrator has considered the pleadings, evidence and contract, and the award was sustained on most claims, including final bill, extra works, labour escalation, watch and ward, material escalation, interest and costs. However, the sales tax refund claim failed because the notification condition was not met, and the separate allowance for loss of turnover or loss of profit due to prolongation was set aside for want of factual foundation. en-us Mon, 12 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Jun 2024 11:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283962 Notice of filing of the arbitral award in court is required to trigger the 30-day limitation period under Article 119(b); mere knowledge of the award or a registry office report is insufficient, so the objections were not time-barred. Interference with an arbitral award remains limited where the arbitrator has considered the pleadings, evidence and contract, and the award was sustained on most claims, including final bill, extra works, labour escalation, watch and ward, material escalation, interest and costs. However, the sales tax refund claim failed because the notification condition was not met, and the separate allowance for loss of turnover or loss of profit due to prolongation was set aside for want of factual foundation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283962