<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 825 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387341</link>
    <description>An air pistol described in the purchase invoice as having power below 7.5 joules and a bore not exceeding 4.5 mm/0.177 was treated as freely importable under the applicable arms regime. Because the relevant document supported the classification and the record did not justify treating the import as one requiring a licence, confiscation of the goods was not sustainable. The appeal was accordingly allowed and the confiscation order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2020 17:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 825 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387341</link>
      <description>An air pistol described in the purchase invoice as having power below 7.5 joules and a bore not exceeding 4.5 mm/0.177 was treated as freely importable under the applicable arms regime. Because the relevant document supported the classification and the record did not justify treating the import as one requiring a licence, confiscation of the goods was not sustainable. The appeal was accordingly allowed and the confiscation order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>