https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387333 The appellant, engaged in fabrication and installation services, availed cenvat credit from a service provider. Allegations of fake invoices led to denial of credit, interests, and penalties. The appellant filed a miscellaneous application with additional evidence, including a retraction statement and bank statement showing service tax deposits by the service provider. The Tribunal remanded the matter for verification of service tax payment, emphasizing that if the provider paid tax without objections, credit would be admissible. All appeals were allowed for remand, granting the appellant the opportunity to present alternative arguments and request cross-examination. en-us Thu, 16 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Oct 2019 09:37:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387333 The appellant, engaged in fabrication and installation services, availed cenvat credit from a service provider. Allegations of fake invoices led to denial of credit, interests, and penalties. The appellant filed a miscellaneous application with additional evidence, including a retraction statement and bank statement showing service tax deposits by the service provider. The Tribunal remanded the matter for verification of service tax payment, emphasizing that if the provider paid tax without objections, credit would be admissible. All appeals were allowed for remand, granting the appellant the opportunity to present alternative arguments and request cross-examination. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 16 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387333