https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387331 The Tribunal set aside the demand for 6% of electricity value due to alleged misuse of common input/services for manufacturing electricity. Relying on legal precedents and the 2016 amendment, the Tribunal found the demand unsustainable, allowing the appeal with consequential relief. The decision was based on the nature of electricity generation from waste products, the applicability of Rule 6 of CCR, 2004, and compliance with the 2016 amendment. en-us Mon, 21 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Nov 2020 11:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387331 The Tribunal set aside the demand for 6% of electricity value due to alleged misuse of common input/services for manufacturing electricity. Relying on legal precedents and the 2016 amendment, the Tribunal found the demand unsustainable, allowing the appeal with consequential relief. The decision was based on the nature of electricity generation from waste products, the applicability of Rule 6 of CCR, 2004, and compliance with the 2016 amendment. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 21 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387331