<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 809 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387325</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the revisionist, holding that mirror glass sheets were not to be taxed as toilet requisites but as unclassified items. The Court emphasized the importance of previous decisions in settling fundamental aspects of tax treatment, preventing unnecessary re-litigation of settled matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 09:14:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 809 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387325</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the revisionist, holding that mirror glass sheets were not to be taxed as toilet requisites but as unclassified items. The Court emphasized the importance of previous decisions in settling fundamental aspects of tax treatment, preventing unnecessary re-litigation of settled matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>