<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1258 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283946</link>
    <description>In a central excise matter, the Supreme Court found no merit in the civil appeals and dismissed them. The order does not record any substantive legal reasoning or interpretative principle, so the available text only supports the procedural outcome in favour of the revenue side.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 07:42:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1258 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283946</link>
      <description>In a central excise matter, the Supreme Court found no merit in the civil appeals and dismissed them. The order does not record any substantive legal reasoning or interpretative principle, so the available text only supports the procedural outcome in favour of the revenue side.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>