https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283943 Section 37 interference with an arbitral award remains confined to narrow statutory grounds, and the court will not re-appreciate evidence or conduct a fresh review of contractual correspondence and termination issues. The tribunal's reasoned findings on validity of termination, rejection of the counterclaim, and absence of public policy or jurisdictional error were already affirmed under Section 34. As the challenge sought impermissible factual reconsideration and did not disclose perversity within the limited appellate scope, the award was left undisturbed and the appeal was rejected. en-us Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283943 Section 37 interference with an arbitral award remains confined to narrow statutory grounds, and the court will not re-appreciate evidence or conduct a fresh review of contractual correspondence and termination issues. The tribunal's reasoned findings on validity of termination, rejection of the counterclaim, and absence of public policy or jurisdictional error were already affirmed under Section 34. As the challenge sought impermissible factual reconsideration and did not disclose perversity within the limited appellate scope, the award was left undisturbed and the appeal was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283943