https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283923 Fraud or misrepresentation alleged in an appointment must be specifically pleaded with particulars and proved by reliable evidence before termination can be justified. The record here showed selection through a regular process, followed by confirmation after one year, while the material relied on did not identify the fraud, the supporting particulars, or any overt act attributable to the employee. On that evidence, the allegation failed, the termination could not be sustained on that basis, and reinstatement with continuity of service was upheld. en-us Fri, 17 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:52:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283923 Fraud or misrepresentation alleged in an appointment must be specifically pleaded with particulars and proved by reliable evidence before termination can be justified. The record here showed selection through a regular process, followed by confirmation after one year, while the material relied on did not identify the fraud, the supporting particulars, or any overt act attributable to the employee. On that evidence, the allegation failed, the termination could not be sustained on that basis, and reinstatement with continuity of service was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 17 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283923