https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283914 The Supreme Court held that the dispute raised by the appellant company regarding the repudiation of liability under clause 13 of the Insurance Policy was not arbitrable as it pertained to the insurer's liability to pay, not the amount of loss or damage. The Court emphasized the insured's obligation to initiate legal proceedings within three months of claim rejection to establish the company's liability. Additionally, the Court found that respondent no. 1's claim was not barred by clause 19 of the policy, ultimately allowing the appeal, setting aside lower court judgments, and dismissing respondent no. 1's application under section 20 of the Arbitration Act. en-us Fri, 03 Oct 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:20:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283914 The Supreme Court held that the dispute raised by the appellant company regarding the repudiation of liability under clause 13 of the Insurance Policy was not arbitrable as it pertained to the insurer's liability to pay, not the amount of loss or damage. The Court emphasized the insured's obligation to initiate legal proceedings within three months of claim rejection to establish the company's liability. Additionally, the Court found that respondent no. 1's claim was not barred by clause 19 of the policy, ultimately allowing the appeal, setting aside lower court judgments, and dismissing respondent no. 1's application under section 20 of the Arbitration Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Oct 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283914