https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283913 The petition filed by Union Construction Company (Private) Limited was dismissed by the High Court. The court emphasized the availability of an alternative remedy through arbitration as per the agreement deed, highlighting that the nature of the issues was administrative, not judicial or quasi-judicial. It was held that enforcing contractual obligations through writs of mandamus under Article 226 was inappropriate, and the court directed the petitioner to pursue arbitration instead of seeking judicial intervention. The petition was dismissed, and any interim stay orders were vacated, with costs imposed on the petitioner. en-us Tue, 14 Jul 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:50:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283913 The petition filed by Union Construction Company (Private) Limited was dismissed by the High Court. The court emphasized the availability of an alternative remedy through arbitration as per the agreement deed, highlighting that the nature of the issues was administrative, not judicial or quasi-judicial. It was held that enforcing contractual obligations through writs of mandamus under Article 226 was inappropriate, and the court directed the petitioner to pursue arbitration instead of seeking judicial intervention. The petition was dismissed, and any interim stay orders were vacated, with costs imposed on the petitioner. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 14 Jul 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283913