https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283912 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, affirming that the Special Judicial Magistrate at Ghaziabad had jurisdiction to entertain the complaint filed by a Dubai-based bank against the petitioner. The interpretation of Section 188 of the Code of Criminal Procedure allows any competent court in India to try offences committed outside India by Indian citizens, with the responsibility to find the accused resting with the court. The court emphasized prioritizing the victim's convenience and deemed the place where the accused is found as the place of the offence. en-us Thu, 25 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:28:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283912 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, affirming that the Special Judicial Magistrate at Ghaziabad had jurisdiction to entertain the complaint filed by a Dubai-based bank against the petitioner. The interpretation of Section 188 of the Code of Criminal Procedure allows any competent court in India to try offences committed outside India by Indian citizens, with the responsibility to find the accused resting with the court. The court emphasized prioritizing the victim's convenience and deemed the place where the accused is found as the place of the offence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 25 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283912